Cases 1 - 10 of 2,574
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 24-9524
Petitioner:
MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramos-Funes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2205
Petitioner:
DOMINGO RAMOS-FUNES and OSIAS MOISES RAMOS-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Melara-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2187
Petitioner:
ERIC DANIEL MELARA-MARTINEZ, EVELYN CAROLINA RAMOS RUIZ, STEVEN MISAEL MARTINEZ RAMOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Evelyn Ramos Juarez De Martinez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1675
Petitioner:
Evelyn Y. Ramos Juarez De Martinez and A.O.M.R.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
