Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos Juarez v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Aaron Ramos Juarez
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv12848
Plaintiff:
Midlalia Ramos
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos-Ortiz v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11946
Plaintiff:
Zayra Ramos-Ortiz
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeannite v. ADS Smith
as 1:2023cv11812
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
ADS Smith, Thomas W Tompkins, Captain McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11815
Plaintiff:
Julianna Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roland et al v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv11586
Plaintiff:
Frederic Roland and Jose Antonio Ramos Lima
Defendant:
Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation and Cardinal Home Delivery Carriers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
