Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Musgrove et al v. Blades et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Defendant:
Brad Little, Scott Brow, Dave Dietz and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore E Musgrove and Jay Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooley v. Blades, et al.
as 24-6043
Respondent:
RANDY BLADES, ISCC Warden and RANDY VALLEY
Petitioner:
THOMAS K. HOOLEY
Lance Wood v. Paul Panther, et al
as 23-35407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE CONWAY WOOD and RENEE WOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL R. PANTHER, Deputy Attorney General, MARK KUBINSKI, Deputy Attorney General, BRENT REINKE, IDOC, Director of Prisons and others
Andrew Wolf v. Idaho State Board of Correction, et al
as 23-35285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, DEBRA FIELD, each sued in their individual and official capacities, and their successors in office, DAVID MCCLUSKEY, each sued in their individual and official capacities, and their successors in office and others
Faron Hawkins v. Gary Raney, et al
as 22-35618
Petitioner / Appellant:
FARON RAYMOND HAWKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY RANEY, Ada County Sheriff, ROGER BOURNE, Ada County Prosecutor, JAN BENNETTS, Ada County Prosecutor and others
Chase Reed v. Randy Blades
as 22-35560
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHASE REED
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Michael Bosse v. Randy Blades, et al
as 21-35904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL BOSSE
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden, SICI, CARLIN, ICIO Warden, MCKAY and others
Michael Bosse v. Randy Blades, et al
as 21-35448
Defendant / Appellee:
IDOC, BELIDEAU, HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL BOSSE
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blades
as 21-71098
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Respondent:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blades
as 21-35208
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.