Cases 1 - 10 of 76
RATTAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23867
Plaintiff:
WARREN RATTAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Barkacs v. Bharat et al
as 2:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
James Barkacs
Defendant:
Rattan Bharat, Perez and Martine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neisen v. Rohmfeld et al
as 3:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Matthew Rohmfeld, Allison Renfro Rattan, Rutherford County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rattan v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03295
Plaintiff:
Katiria Rattan
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Henderson v. Rattan et al
as 2:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Darren Henderson
Defendant:
Rattan, Lynch, M. Bobbala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noor v. Hussain NH et al
as 1:2022cv03711
Plaintiff:
Ayesha Noor NH
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain NH, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain NH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ayesha v. Hussain et al
as 2:2022cv02284
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rattan v. Rizilard et al
as 2:2021cv14432
Plaintiff:
Kishore Rattan
Defendant:
Rizilard and Mark S. Inch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al v. IFOOD, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. and STEAK N SHAKE, LLC
Defendant:
IFOOD, INC., SHASHKI K. RATTAN and CHANDRU C. GURNANI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Musa v. Franco et al
as 1:2020cv03560
Defendant:
Franco, Resto, USA and others
Plaintiff:
Jawad Amir Musa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
