Cases 1 - 10 of 39
(PC) Wilson v. Morales et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Bryan D. Phillips, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, M. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Smith et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Defendant:
Jim Cooper, County of Sacramento, Michael Allen Savage and others
Plaintiff:
Rashid Deshawn Deary-Smith and Patricia Lynn Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(HC) Nixon v. Morales
as 2:2024cv01531
Petitioner:
Brandon Nixon
Respondent:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Raul Morales
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Christensen v. Morales
as 2:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Joshua Christensen
Defendant:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Christensen v. Morales
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Joshua Christensen
Defendant:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MORALES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21715
Plaintiff:
RAUL MORALES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Kidwell v. Collins, et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper, Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell and Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Jason Collins, Donna Williams, Jose Cisneros Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Morales
as 1:2021cv01453
Plaintiff:
Raul Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Morales v Capital One Financial Corporation
as 1:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Raul Morales
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation, The Board of Directors of Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One Financial Corporation Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
