Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Romero-Rios
as 22-40800
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Romero-Rios
Bushnell et al v. Madison County Jail IL et al
as 3:2022cv02672
Plaintiff:
Joseph K Bushnell, Jevon Wilburn, Jason Spink and others
Defendant:
Madison County Jail IL, Sgt. Caldwell and Stephen Ridings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Granados-Corona
as 22-2323
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Raul Romero-Granados, AKA Chicarcas, AKA El Negro, Isaac Lomeli-Rivera, AKA Giro, Juan Romero-Granados, AKA Chegoya, AKA El Guero and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Efrain Granados-Corona, AKA Chavito, AKA Cepillo
Michael Gonzales et al v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv08299
Plaintiff:
Michael Ralston, Ronald Flores, Norbeto Alarcon and others
Defendant:
Sting Funez, Charter Communications, Inc., Artur Kosinski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
URENA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58979
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAUL ROMERO URENA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales et al v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02689
Plaintiff:
Michael Ralston, Ronald Flores, Norbeto Alarcon and others
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romero v. RTS of Cape Coral, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00686
Plaintiff:
Raul Romero
Defendant:
RTS of Cape Coral, Inc. and Thomas Cirrincione
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
