Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Blanchard v. Labbe et al
as 1:2025cv01615
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
C. Labbe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Nichols et al
as 1:2024cv01888
Defendant:
C. Phillip Nichols and Thomas D. Gorman, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Warden for Maryland Correctional Training Center, et al.
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Warden for MCTC, Correctional Officer Sanchez, Warden for Maryland Correctional Training Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Security Operatios Personell et al
as 1:2023cv01747
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Security Operatios Personell, Mr. Hendrix, NSAI U.S. Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
William Bohrer, DPSCS Corrections and Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Frosh
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Mr. Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Thomas Wolfe and Personell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Biven et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Petitioner:
Ray Blanchard
Respondent:
Brian E. Frosh and Warden Carlos D. Biven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blanchard v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10094
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Ray Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
