Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Purvis v. Escambia County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv00456
Defendant:
Escambia County Sheriff's Office, Cody Hiers, James Ward and others
Plaintiff:
James Lonnie Purvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Muhammad Abdul Qadir v. Latrell Wilson
as 20-1504
Defendant / Appellee:
LATRELL S. WILSON, ATTORNEY RAYMOND D. TURNER, ATTORNEY DAVID H. MAYBANK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD W.K. ABDUL QADIR
Amber Jones et al v. City of Rialto
as 5:2017cv01514
Plaintiff:
David Hernandez, Joseph Brown, Shaun R Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
City of Rialto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Atrizco-Alvaraez a/n/f of Minor, F.M. v. Rooney Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Alma Delia Atrizco-Alvaraez a/n/f of Minor, F.M.
Defendant:
Rooney Trucking, Inc. and John Doe, as personal representative of the Estate of Bradley Ray Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porterfield v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
Walter Julious Porterfield
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Ray Farmer, Mike Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Walter Julious Porterfield
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Ray Farmer, Mike Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. USA
as 3:2015cv00065
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Ray Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Christopher Farmer
as 14-6117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RAY FARMER
Billy Farmer, III, et al v. LA Elec & Financial Crimes, et al
as 13-30422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY RAY FARMER, III and DIANA FARMER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA ELECTRONIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES TASK FORCE, TOBY AGUILLARD, MARCUS MCMILLIAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
