Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Sibert v. Raycom Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
William D. Sibert
Defendant:
Raycom Media, Inc. , Adam Cannavo and Lyle Schulze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Singletary, Jr. v. The City of North Charleston
as 17-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY and others
Defendant:
OFFICER JONATHAN GLENN, CHANNEL 5 NEWS, CEDRUS DAVIS & FLOYD and others
Molthan v. Meredith Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Molthan
Defendant:
Meredith Corp. and Raycom Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARRY v. SOASH et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT BARRY
Defendant:
BARI SOASH , JIM WILCOX and RAYCOM MEDIA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Williams v. Media General Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Darius Williams
Defendant:
Media General Operations, Inc. , Raycom Media, Inc. , Jackson-Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Percy v. Raycom Media, Inc.
as 1:2016cv05217
Plaintiff:
Billups Percy
Defendant:
Raycom Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Landry v. Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv03900
Plaintiff:
Saul Francis Landry, III
Defendant:
Chabert Operational Management Company, L.L.C., Joseph Waitz, Jr., Houma Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. v. Green Law Firm, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Green Law Firm, LLC, Isaacs & Isaacs, P.S.C., Media General Communications Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
