Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Price v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Raymond Price
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Price v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2020cv22623
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raymond Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv06664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams Outdoor Advertising L.P. v. RPM Realty Company et al
as 3:2019cv00366
Defendant:
Ray Price MZ Motors, Inc., Ray Price Motors, Inc., Ray Price Ford Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adams Outdoor Advertising L.P.
Undetermined:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Price et al
as 1:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
Emmit Raymond Price, Faith Price, Vineyard Church in Christ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson, IV v. Price et al
as 4:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant:
Raymond Price, Vineyard Church in Christ, Dorthy Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Price, III, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
as 15-2196
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND PRICE, III and LYNN M. PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Price v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03746
Plaintiff:
Raymond Price
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Mark Starring and Associates Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20518
Plaintiff:
Raymond Price
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00782
Plaintiff:
Raymond Price
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
