Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Marshall-Johnson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24562
Plaintiff:
Regina Marshall-Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARSHALL et al v. DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 3:2013cv03921
Plaintiff:
REGINA MARSHALL and CHANZIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, AUDREY P. BLACKBURN, RONDA KILLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adler et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01903
Plaintiff:
Mark S Adler , Tony Brooks , Steven Gallippi and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Marshall v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-02021
Plaintiff:
Regina Marshall
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Marshall v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv02021
Plaintiff:
Regina Marshall
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARSHALL v. NEW JERSEY OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 3:2012cv01542
Plaintiff:
REGINA MARSHALL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, ELAN BANKSTON, WILLA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Regina Marshall
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LaBoy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv04434
Plaintiff:
Hector LaBoy
Defendant:
Elizabeth Johnson, Regina Marshall, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
