Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Richard Shreves v. David Harris, et al
as 23-35154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER, MARISA BOSTWICK and others
Makueeyapee Whitford v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 22-35526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAKUEEYAPEE D. WHITFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL, CYNTHIA WOLKEN, JIM SALMONSEN and others
Richard Shreves v. USDC-MHE
as 21-71407
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RICHARD E. SHREVES, DAVID WILLIAM HARRIS, WENDY ZUBER and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Makueeyapee Whitford v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 21-35570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAKUEEYAPEE D. WHITFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL, CYNTHIA WOLKEN, JIM SALMONSEN and others
Burd v. Sgt. Weber et al
as 6:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Shane Louis Burd
Defendant:
Carrie Walsted, Lt. Postma, Billie Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Burkbile et al
as 4:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Conell, Burkbile, Vines and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitford v. Michael et al
as 6:2020cv00080
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Cynthia Wolken, Reginald D. Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Makueeyapee D. Whitford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demarie v. Michael et al
as 6:2020cv00048
Respondent:
Lynn Guyer and Reginald D. Michael
Petitioner:
Darren C. Demarie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Michael et al
as 9:2020cv00054
Petitioner:
Anthony Evans
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Reginald D. Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Steilman v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 20-35103
Respondent / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK E. STEILMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
