Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19437
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tracy Marrow v. Lawler, et al
as 21-2063
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAWLER, SCI-Huntingdon, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, MRS. SUSAN WOLFE, Records Room Employee - SCI-Frackville and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY MARROW, a/k/a Reginald Hawkins a/k/a Jeffrey Boyd
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Felix Brim , Eric Hudson , Kurt Williams and others
Defendant:
Combe, Incoprated , Combe Incorporated , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Reginald Hawkin
as 16-4076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Reginald Hawkins v. Coleman Hall, et al
as 11-3467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLEMAN HALL, C.C.F., JOSEPH COLEMAN, Ex. Rel., JOHN CURL, Director and others
Hawkins v. PA. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv02568
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hawkins
Defendant:
PA. Department of Corrections , S.C.I. - Huntingdon , R.M. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv08915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAWKINS v. HALL et al
as 2:2010cv04973
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Defendant:
COLEMAN HALL, JOSEPH COLEMAN, JOHN CURL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv04149
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Defendant:
R. M. LAWLER, R. MCKINNEY, GRANDLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWKINS v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2009cv00344
Petitioner:
REGINALD HAWKINS
Respondent:
LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
