Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Shaw v. Habitat for Humanity et al
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Habitat for Humanity, Eula Jackson, Liz Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ellis-Erkkila v. Citibank
as 23-50648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila, true name Priscilla Ann Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, BB&T Bank and others
Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03460
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. RSA Tower et al(MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
RSA Tower, Donald Terry and Associates and RSA Regions Bank Tower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. RSA Tower et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
RSA Tower, Donald Terry and Associates and RSA Regions Bank Tower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
