Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clervrain et al v. Heimlich et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Caleb Heimlich, Olga Farnam, Marlene Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Pincus et al
as 1:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lee
Defendant:
Mark Pincus , John Schappert , William Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kolomiets v. Pincus et al
as 1:2012cv01233
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Kolomiets
Defendant:
Mark Pincus , John Schappert , Reid Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Reyes v. Zynga Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05065
Plaintiff:
Robert Reyes
Defendant:
Zynga Inc. , Mark Pincus , David M. Wehner and others
Movant:
David Fee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Weber v. Pincus et al
as 3:2012cv04684
Plaintiff:
Jeanna Weber
Defendant:
Mark Pincus, William Gordon, Reid Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Choukri v. Zynga Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04629
Plaintiff:
Karim Choukri
Defendant:
Zynga Inc., Mark Pincus, David M. Wehner and others
Movant:
David Fee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Barron v. Pincus et al
as 4:2012cv04547
Plaintiff:
Stacy Barron
Defendant:
Mark Pincus, David M. Wehner, Mark Vranesh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yan v. Zynga Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv04360
Plaintiff:
Jun Yan
Defendant:
Zynga Inc., Mark Pincus, David M. Wehner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Albin v. Pincus et al
as 3:2012cv04330
Plaintiff:
Marc Albin
Defendant:
Mark Pincus, Cadir Lee, Reid Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRA for the Benefit lof Karl Graulich v. Pincus et al
as 3:2012cv04327
Plaintiff:
IRA for the Benefit lof Karl Graulich
Defendant:
Mark Pincus, John Schappert, William Gordon and others
Miscellaneou:
Zygna Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
