Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Blackberry Limited v. Pearlstein
as 21-243
Petitioner:
Steve Zipperstein, Blackberry Limited, FKA Research In Motion Limited, Washington Legal Foundation and others
Respondent:
Marvin Pearlstein, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiuated
Pearlstein v. Blackberry Limited
as 19-3376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yong M. Cho and Batuhan Ulug
Defendant / Appellee:
Thorsten Heins, Blackberry Limited, FKA Research In Motion Limited, Steve Zipperstein and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Dinzik, Todd Cox and Marvin Pearlstein, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiuated
IN RE: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMI
as 13-1602
Plaintiff:
Laura Prefontaine, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Shemian
Defendant - Appellee:
Research In Motion Limited, Brian Bidulka, James L. Balsillie and others
McNeal et al v. Research In Motion Limited et al
as 1:2011cv05472
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeal and Kenneth Gold
Defendant:
Research In Motion Limited , Brian Bidulka , James L. Balsillie and others
Movant:
Robert Shemian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Demarkis v. Research In Motion Limited et al
as 1:2011cv04560
Plaintiff:
Nancy A. Demarkis
Defendant:
Research In Motion Limited , Brian Bidulka , James L. Balsillie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Prefontaine v. Research In Motion Limited et al
as 1:2011cv04068
Plaintiff:
Laura Prefontaine
Defendant:
Research In Motion Limited , Brian Bidulka , James L. Balsillie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chatlin v. Research In Motion Limited et al
as 1:2011cv03988
Plaintiff:
Gerald Chatlin
Defendant:
Research In Motion Limited, Brian Bidulka, James L. Balsillie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stabile v. Research in Motion Limited
as 1:2011cv03615
Plaintiff:
Mary T. Stabile
Defendant:
Research In Motion Limited, Brian Bidulka and Mihalis Michael Lazaridis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited
as 3:2008mc80031
Plaintiff:
Visto Corporation
Defendant:
Research in Motion Limited
3rd Party Defendant:
Google Inc., Google Inc. and Google Inc.
INPRO II LICENSING V T-MOBILE USA
as 05-1233
Plaintiff-Appellant:
INPRO II LICENSING, S.A.R.L.
Defendant-Appellee:
RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION, RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
