Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yvonne Mack v. Resurgent Capital Services, L., et al
as 21-2792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YVONNE MACK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Kevin Woods v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 21-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN WOODS
Defendant / Appellee:
RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
Johnathan Valentine v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 20-3179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN VALENTINE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
RESURGENCE LEGAL GROUP, P.C., RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC
James Stewart v. Credit Control, LLC, et al
as 20-2466
Defendant / Appellee:
CREDIT CONTROL, LLC, LVNV FUNDING, LLC, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STEWART
Marvin Ross v. PYOD, LLC, et al
as 15-3721
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: MARVIN ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
PYOD, LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.
Scott McMahon v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 15-8018
Petitioner:
SCOTT MCMAHON
Respondent:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., ALEGIS GROUP, LLC and others
Joshua Birtchman v. LVNV Funding, LLC, et al
as 15-2109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA BIRTCHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.
PYOD, LLC, et al v. Stacy Patrick
as 14-8028
Petitioner:
PYOD, LLC, a DE LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., a DE limited partnership
Respondent:
STACY PATRICK, formerly known as COMPTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
