Cases 31 - 40 of 164
Donald Sherman v. Harold Wickham, et al
as 23-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
HAROLD WICKHAM, KIM THOMAS, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Sanchez v. Cornutt et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Paul Sanchez
Defendant:
Cornutt, T. Cooke, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Tristan et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Tristan, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Rowley et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Cory Rowley, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Crowder et al
as 3:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Crowder, David Drummond and William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Reubart
as 2:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Defendant:
William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Leibel v. Reubart et al
as 2:2023cv00691
Petitioner:
Tatiana Leibel
Respondent:
Warden Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Cooke
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Warden Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
