Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Welch v. Rowley et al
as 3:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Cory Rowley, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Pickens et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Pickens, Brandon Stubbs, Kleer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Hearring v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-16836
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK HEARRING
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dorsey v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Denzel R. Dorsey
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollett v. Hunt et al
as 2:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
David G. Hollett
Defendant:
Hunt, Reubart and Cooke
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmisten v. Pickens et al
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Justin Edmisten
Defendant:
Pickens, Kleer, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
Hearring v. Reubart et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Petitioner:
Frank Hearring
Respondent:
William Reubart and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
