Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DE JESUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76893
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DE JESUS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE JESUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10913
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DE JESUS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03260
Plaintiff:
GARY GROSE, THOMAS GORDON, JEREMIAH CUNDIFF and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grose et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02253
Plaintiff:
Gary Grose, Thomas Gordon, Jeremiah Cundiff and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
de Jesus-Navedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01329
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ricardo de Jesus-Navedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE LEAD CASE IS NOW 18-1305 (WGY)
as 3:2018cv01906
Plaintiff:
De Jesus & Matos Medical Imaging Professionals, P.S.C.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Nelson Felipe Matos-Ruiz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Carlos Mendez-Buso, Company ABC, John & Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Jesus Gomez et al v. Matos Ruiz
as 3:2018cv01305
Plaintiff:
Ricardo De Jesus Gomez , Pedro Diaz Ortiz and Carlos Mendez Buso
Defendant:
Nelson Felipe Matos Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ricardo Zelaya Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72331
Petitioner:
RICARDO DE JESUS ZELAYA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Ricardo Zelaya Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71494
Petitioner:
RICARDO DE JESUS ZELAYA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00749
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
