Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Richard Canatella v. CIR
as 18-71399
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Richard Canatella v. CIR
as 18-71338
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Richard Canatella v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, In, et al
as 16-17281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA, individually and as Trustee of the Canatela Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC. and JULIAN CASTRO, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Canatella v. Donovan et al
as 3:2013cv05937
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Canatella
Defendant:
Shaun Donovan and Reverse Mortgage Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461
Richard Canatella v. USDC-CASF
as 13-71585
:
In re: RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Petitioner:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Richard Canatella, et al v. CIR
as 13-71465
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA and ZINI CANATELLA
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Richard Canatella v. Krieg Keller Sloan Reilly & Ro, et al
as 12-16086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Defendant - Appellee:
KRIEG KELLER SLOAN REILLY & ROMAN LLP, STEVEN H. HERMAN, JAMES C. KRIEG and others
Canatella v. Krieg Keller Sloan Reilley & Roman LLP et al
as 3:2011cv05535
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Canatella
Defendant:
Krieg Keller Sloan Reilley & Roman LLP , Steven H. Herman, James C. Krieg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Canatella v. USA
as 11-16827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD A. CANATELLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Canatella v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv02175
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Canatella
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
