Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Baker v. Sinacori et al
as 2:2025cv00036
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Defendant:
Sean Sinacori and Brad Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Baker v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv07282
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Baker v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
William Richard Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Baker et al v. Ambasador Nursing and Rehab et al
as 4:2024cv10791
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker and Richard Perry
Defendant:
Ambasador Nursing and Rehab, Frank LNU, April LNU and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17181
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Salah Bazzi v. Wayne State University, et al
as 23-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALAH BAZZI
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, DOCTOR CHRISTOPHER STEFFES and DOCTOR RICHARD BAKER
Baker et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv11388
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker and Kim Albright
Defendant:
Marla Jones, Alex-Cindy Lamb, Michael Polsinelli and others
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02343
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
