Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Qian Williams v. Dale Taylor, et al
as 25-3230
Plaintiff:
QIAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DALE TAYLOR, KENNETH BAKER, KARL P. KADON, III and others
Richard Monahan v. Red Mule Express LLC
as 25-1217
Plaintiff:
Richard Monahan
Defendant:
Red Mule Express LLC
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monahan v. Red Mule Express LLC
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Richard Monahan
Defendant:
Red Mule Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MONAHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44592
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MONAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles v. Richards-Monahan
as 1:2020at00370
Defendant:
Sherry Richards-Monahan
Plaintiff:
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles v. Richards-Monahan
as 1:2020at00369
Defendant:
Sherry Richards-Monahan
Plaintiff:
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles v. Richards-Monahan
as 1:2020cv00719
Defendant:
Sherry Richards-Monahan
Plaintiff:
IQ Academy of California - Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Monahan v. Medex Patient Transport, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv01119
Plaintiff:
Richard Monahan
Defendant:
Medex Patient Transport, LLC, Caliber Patient Care, LLC, K.R. Calvert Co., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coggeshall, et al v. Massachusetts Board of Regist, et al
as 09-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH COGGESHALL, Father and Next Friend of Z, a Minor Child and L. LYNN LESUEUR
Defendant - Appellee:
MA BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF PSYCHOLOGISTS, RICHARD MONAHAN, KEVIN BULMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
