Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols, Kathleen Nickol and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00769
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Bob Williams, Dale Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Seaver v. MA Parole Board, et al
as 10-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA PAROLE BOARD, MARK CONRAD, in his individual capacity, DORIS DOTTRIDGE, in her individual capacity and others
Movant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOUIS FABBRI
Seaver v. Fabbri
as 10-2074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOUIS FABBRI
Seaver v. Fabbri
as 1:2010cv10613
Plaintiff:
Richard Seaver
Defendant:
Michael Fabbri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaver, et al v. Conrad, et al
as 10-1445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CONRAD, in his individual capacity, DORIS DOTTRIDGE, in her individual capacity, CANDACE KOCHIN, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Seaver v. Bates, et al
as 10-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BATES, MICHAEL DEVINE, GARY RODEN and others
Seaver v. Bates et al
as 1:2009cv11379
Plaintiff:
Richard Seaver
Defendant:
William Bates, Michael Devine, Gary Roden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seaver v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 1:2009cv11284
Plaintiff:
Richard Seaver
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark Conrad, Doris Dottridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
