Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HAYNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13683
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEARING et al v. IQVIA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00574
Plaintiff:
Nelson Sievers, Janice Gullick, Bobby T Trussel and others
Defendant:
IQVIA HOLDINGS, INC., IQVIA, INC., John (1-30) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SCHWARTZ v. URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05978
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., RICHARD A. HAYNE, FRANK J. CONFORTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Richard Haynes v. Carolyn Colvin
as 13-35724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Markous et al v. Place et al
as 3:2012cv00139
Plaintiff:
Eileen Markous and Matthew Markous
Defendant:
Seth A. Place, Richard J. Haynes, Morgan County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Haynes v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv05271
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Richard L Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
CHECHELE v. HAYNE et al
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
DONNA ANN GABRIELE CHECHELE
Defendant:
RICHARD A. HAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Caston v. Switzerland Government, et al
as 10-5046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Caston
Defendant - Appellee:
Switzerland Government, United States Department of Justice, Hearst Corporation and others
CASTON v. SWITZERLAND GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
SWITZERLAND GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, HEARST CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
