Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
U-Haul Co of Arkansas v. Hyatt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00828
Plaintiff: U-Haul Co of Arkansas
Defendant: William Hyatt, Cameron Mutual Insurance Company, Santoshi Krupa LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Tepe v. Corker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff: Mawule Tepe
Defendant: Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
US v. Richard Patterson
as 23-6021
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
US v. Richard Smith, Jr.
as 22-7283
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR., a/k/a Smitty
United States of America v. Richard Allen La Bianco
as 8:2022cv01986
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Richard Allen La Bianco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
In re: Richard Smith, Jr.
as 22-1892
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, JR., a/k/a Smitty
USA v. Richard Allen Harris, Jr.
as 22-11533
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD ALLEN HARRIS
US v. Richard Patterson
as 22-6264
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD ALLEN PATTERSON
Larsen v. Aroostook Mental Health Center
as 21-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Defendant / Appellee: AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH CENTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?