Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Barry v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Richard Barry
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Richard Reed, II v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
as 23-10226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BARRIE REED, II
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FORT PIERCE, CITY MANAGER, FORT PIERCE, FORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
MAURO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10633
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARRY MAURO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce et al
as 2:2020cv14385
Defendant:
City Manager Nicholas C. Mimms, City of Fort Pierce, Diane Hobley-Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
as 2:2020cv14386
Defendant:
City Manager Nicholas C. Mimms, Diane Hobley-Burney, Chief of Police Diane Hobley-Burney and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Barrie Reed, II and Richard B Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'CONNOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88650
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARRY O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce, et al.
as 2:2020cv14277
Defendant:
City of Fort Pierce, et al.
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Fort PIerce, et al.
as 2:2020cv14276
Defendant:
City of Fort PIerce, et al.
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce, et al
as 2:2020cv14275
Defendant:
City of Fort Pierce, et al
Plaintiff:
Mr Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. City of Fort Pierce,et al.
as 2:2020cv14278
Defendant:
City of Fort Pierce
Plaintiff:
Richard Barrie Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
