Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HAMPTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31230
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HAMPTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hampton v. Staley et al
as 4:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem and Richard Hampton
Defendant:
John Staley and Kristi Flud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMPTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48968
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LE Holdings LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 4:2020cv00182
Plaintiff:
LE Holdings LLC d/b/a Obama Block
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company and Charles Richard Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Scurlock et al
as 5:2018cv00049
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Richard Hampton Scurlock, III and RTAG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hampton v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
Richard Hampton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13820
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Miller v. Lee et al
as 3:2013cv00359
Defendant:
CEO Feliciana Forensic Facility, Feliciana Forensic Facility and Richard Hampton Lee
Plaintiff:
William Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Hampton v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-78019
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Richard Hampton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.