Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Shortt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Mark Shortt, Rob Hibbitt, Gordon Cooper and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shortt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02808
Plaintiff:
Mark Shortt, Rob Hibbitt, Gordon Cooper and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Shawn Monro v. Brad Cain
as 22-35396
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN RICHARD MONRO
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN
Monroe v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv01868
Plaintiff:
Richard Monroe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Crawford v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01705
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Richard Monroe Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Monro v. Cain et al
as 2:2020cv00866
Defendant:
Lisa Cain, Jeff Moura and Joe E Capps
Plaintiff:
Shawn Richard Monro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12328
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MANN, John Floy, Nora Ferrari and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Monro v. Cain
as 2:2018cv01458
Petitioner:
Shawn Richard Monro
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford, Sr. v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02198
Plaintiff:
Richard Monroe Crawford, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Monroe v. Colvin
as 5:2015cv01235
Plaintiff:
Richard Monroe
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
