Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hardy v. Adams County et al
as 1:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Ralph Marcus Hardy
Defendant:
Adams County and Richard Reigenborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burden v. Reigenborn et al
as 1:2022cv03095
Plaintiff:
Shane D. Burden
Defendant:
Richard Reigenborn, D.O.C Director, Matthew Rohar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aschenbrenner v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
Jeff Aschenbrenner
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borowski v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Borowski
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armijo v. Adams County et al
as 1:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Armijo
Defendant:
Adams County, Sheriff Richard Reigenborn, Nichole Durante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welker v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02504
Plaintiff:
Theodore Welker
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
Reagan Garcia, Paul Graham, Theodore Welker and others
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv02506
Plaintiff:
Paul Graham
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason, Richard Reigenborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Ring et al
as 1:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hardy
Defendant:
Megan Ring, Brian Mason and Richard Reigenborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Adams County et al
as 1:2021cv02806
Plaintiff:
Jason Romero
Defendant:
Adams County, Richard Reigenborn, Ian Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
