Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Peterson v. Sutter Medical Foundation, et al.
as 23-2911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH PETERSON, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUTTER MEDICAL FOUNDATION, SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS, DBA ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, EDEN MEDICAL CENTER and others
Allen Hassan v. California Medical Board, et al
as 21-17033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN C. HASSAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD and UC SAN DIEGO PACE PROGRAM
Defendant:
KIMBERLY KIRCHMEYER, HOWARD R. KRAUSS, M.D., M.D. FELIX C. YIP and others
Thorpe v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02558
Plaintiff:
Karl Richard Thorpe
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Joe Neguse and Beth McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv01932
Plaintiff:
Karl Richard Thorpe
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Joe Neguse and Beth McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Sutter Medical Foundation et al
as 3:2021cv04908
Defendant:
Laurie Rose Lubiano, Michael Bishop, Sutter Medical Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hassan v. California Medical Board et al
as 2:2019at01178
Defendant:
Denise Pines, Kimberly Kirchmeyer, ASIF MAHMOOD and others
Plaintiff:
Allen C Hassan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Hassan v. California Medical Board et al
as 2:2019cv02521
Defendant:
Denise Pines, Laurie Rose Lubiano, California Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Allen C. Hassan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Thorpe v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2017cv01670
Petitioner:
Karl Richard Thorpe
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, Matthew Hensen and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REILLY-WEISSMAN et al v. THORPE et al
as 2:2016cv05234
Plaintiff:
DAWN REILLY-WEISSMAN and JOHN WEISSMAN
Defendant:
RICHARD THORPE and ANTOINETTE THORPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
