Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Clarence Goree v. J. Serio, et al
as 17-3144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE G. GOREE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SERIO, Special Investigative Services, JEANETTE SPENCE, FCI Greenville, RICHARD W. SCHOTT, Regional Counsel and others
Goree v. Serio et al
as 3:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Clarence G. Goree
Defendant:
J. Serio, Jeanette Spence, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lutz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01008
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lutz
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Scott Moats and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bauer v. Schott et al
as 4:2015cv01034
Plaintiff:
Frederick William Bauer
Defendant:
Richard W Schott, Thomas Burke, Joshua M Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEWART v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2015cv00309
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, ONE UNKNOWN CORRECTIONS OFFICER and RICHARD W. SCHOTT
Plaintiff:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ronald Williams v. Richard Schott, et al
as 14-2375
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICHARD W. SCHOTT, CLINT SWIFT, J. SIMMONS and others
Watson v. Evans et al
as 5:2013cv03035
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cesal v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv01524
Plaintiff:
Craig J Cesal
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Richard W Schott, . Olmelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jensen v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2012cv05052
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jensen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Richard W. Schott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephan Moorer-Bey v. BOP, et al
as 12-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHAN MOORER-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, STEPHEN COPE, AMBER NELSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
