Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Williams v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Kent Williams
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helburn et al v. Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nicholas Helburn
Defendant:
Centurion Health Services of Idaho LLC, Solomon Brothers Inc., Saint Alphonsus Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Julian Quinones
Defendant:
IDOC, ISMI and Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Erick Virgil Hall
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson, Dagoberto Martinez, Camron Duramus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedli v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joshua Friedli
Defendant:
Richardson, Eliason, Patchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc. v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Moonlight Mountain Recovery, Inc.
Defendant:
Justin McCoy, Eric Minnig, Corey Richardson and others
Rogstad v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00588
Petitioner:
Jesse Rogstad
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
