Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Vallejo v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Rick Farris, Ms Fredieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Mgr Fredieu, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Stacey Carter
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Rick Farris, Deputy Genning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prator
as 23-30064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Prator and Rick Farris
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv06151
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Rick Farris, M Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv06060
Plaintiff:
Chaves Hodges
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Deputy Bailey, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv05342
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Rick Farris and M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv05235
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv05341
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Rick Farris and M Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Billy G Wright
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Rick Farris and Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.