Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Rachal v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2018cv00809
Plaintiff:
Jeremy X Rachal
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, R B Wyche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Foy et al
as 5:2018cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael London
Defendant:
Paul Foy, Steve Prator, Robert Wyche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Foy et al
as 3:2018cv00372
Defendant:
Unknown Englade, Rick Farris, Paul Foy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Brown et al
as 5:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thomas
Defendant:
Levy Brown, Steve Prator, Robert Wyche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Caddo Correctional Center et al
as 5:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Sanders
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Robert B Wyche, Rayborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Prator et al
as 5:2013cv02443
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Dupree, II
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Robert Wyche, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Nunnery et al
as 5:2012cv02563
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Charles Manning
Defendant:
Nunnery, A L Dinkins, Jr, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Prator et al
as 5:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sandy Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Jay R Wright, Robert B Wyche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Prator et al
as 5:2008cv00794
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dewayne Bailey
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Tommy King, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Prator, et al
as 5:2007cv00126
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Walker
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Dorothy Troudt, Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
