Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Clark v. Wiseman et al
as 2:2023cv05047
Plaintiff:
Ricky Clark
Defendant:
Christopher Wiseman and Altec Capital Trust, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. CLARK
as 2:2021cv05139
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RICKY CLARK INDIVIDUALLY, AND doing business as VINTAGE CIGAR ROOM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Rickie Clark v. City of San Bernardino, et al
as 5:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Rickie Clark
Defendant:
City of San Bernardino, a California municipal entity, Brandon McCauley, DOES 1-100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Ricky Clark and Marlena Clark
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Cade Richard Cole and Patrick A Juneau, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharkey v. Progressive Security Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv02792
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sharkey
Defendant:
Frederick Williams, James River Insurance Company, Ricky Jermain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. USA
as 6:2018cv01095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricky Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Ricky Clark
as 17-4651
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICKY CLARK
Carlie Spiers, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLIE SPIERS, SANDRA WALKER, EVELYN WYATT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
