Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Rivera v. Bedinelli et al
as 3:2024cv30051
Plaintiff:
Heduin Rivera
Defendant:
Anthony Bedinelli, Tommie O. Hart, Brendan Linnehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10534
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Rivera
Respondent:
Nelson B. Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. U.S District Court
as 1:2024cv10268
Petitioner:
Benito Rivera
Respondent:
U.S District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roy v. Town of Easthampton et al
as 3:2023cv30128
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lee Roy
Defendant:
Town of Easthampton, Luis A Rivera and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rivera v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv12718
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Rivera
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv12346
Plaintiff:
Shandel Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivera et al v. Safway Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12184
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Rivera and Vanessa Rivera as p/n/g of K.C.
Defendant:
Safway Services, LLC and Brand Safway Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rivera v. Kelly
as 1:2023cv12046
Petitioner:
Heriberto Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent Sheila Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv30086
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Villanueva Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
