Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
as 2:2024cv10667
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
Diamond v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2023cv12464
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank, Riverbend Apartments, Charger Properties and others
Earl Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments, et al
as 23-1862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL DIAMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERBEND APARTMENTS and CHARGER PROPERTIES
Earl Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments, et al
as 23-1536
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL DIAMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
RIVERBEND APARTMENTS and CHARGER PROPERTIES
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments et al
as 2:2023cv11353
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments, Charger Properties and Piper Law
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments
as 2:2023cv10665
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments
SABO v. 230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID SABO
Defendant:
230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC doing business as EMESS MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM UNKNOWN, STEPHANIE UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Broderick et al v. 230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Brandon Broderick and DAVID SABO
Defendant:
230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC, WILLIAM UNKNOWN, STEPHANIE UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SABO v. 230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID SABO
Defendant:
230 RIVERBEND APARTMENTS LLC doing business as EMESS MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM UNKNOWN, STEPHANIE UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cure v. Riverbend Apartments et al
as 8:2016cv00154
Defendant:
Bruce A. Cordingley, Thomas G. Crowe, Pedcor Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Cure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
