Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Speyrer et al v. Williams et al

as 6:2019cv01282
Defendant:
Khalil Clay, Riverbend Detention Center and Wydette Williams
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Caleb Speyrer and Teri D Speyrer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eurings v. Gusman et al

as 2:2018cv03336
Plaintiff:
Henry Eurings
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman, Medical Intake Dept, Warden McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Knight et al
as 3:2016cv00823
Defendant:
Edward Knight, Johnny Hedgemon, Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis J Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. East Carroll Parish et al

as 3:2015cv02408
Plaintiff:
William L McCoy
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept East Carroll Parish, Riverbend Detention Center and Bossier Medium Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections et al

as 3:2015cv02180
Plaintiff:
Jacob McCalister Bell, Sr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc, River Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Louisiana Depart of Public Safety & Corr et al et al
as 3:2015cv00506
Defendant:
All Health Care Providers, James LeBlanc, Louisiana Depart of Public Safety & Corr et al and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob McCalister Bell, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fifi v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 5:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
Wayne Fifi
Defendant:
Warden Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitlock v. Riverbend Detention Center

as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Steven Whitlock
Defendant:
Warden Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dupas v. Riverbend Detention Center

as 3:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dupas
Defendant:
Warden Riverbend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Jones et al

as 3:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
Travis D Wilson
Defendant:
Alvin Jones, Shumate, Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.