Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Peter Allan, Sr. v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 23-1157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Allan, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, In their official & individual capacity, Lucinda Jesson, In their official & individual capacity, Dennis Benson, In their official & individual capacity and others
Senty-Haugen v. Jesson et al

as 0:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Jesson et al

as 0:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Allan, Sr. v. Cal Ludeman, et al

as 19-1987
Defendant / Appellee:
David Bornus, Emily Johnson Piper, Jerry Fjerkenstad and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Allan, Sr.
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Michelle Hoover, et al

as 16-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Hoover, Lucinda Jesson, Daniel Storkamp and others
Joseph Favors v. Michelle Hoover, et al
as 14-3705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant - Appellee:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
Senty-Haugen et al v. Jesson et al

as 0:2014cv03405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Russell John Hatton and Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al

as 0:2013cv02958
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favors v. Hoover et al

as 0:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant:
Michelle Hoover, Cal Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson and others
Favors v. Jesson et al

as 0:2013cv00108
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Respondent:
Lucinda Jesson , Joan Fabian , Cal Ludeman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.