Cases 1 - 10 of 28
O'Toole v. Danaher et al
as 4:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Ryan James O'Toole
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Teena Lenger, Michele Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costello v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Costello
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Corrections, Erica Adeyemi, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Casey B. Clifton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trail v. Jeffreys
as 4:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Aubrey C. Trail
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cody v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Cody
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonor v. Jeffreys et al
as 8:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Leonor
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys and Mike Hilgers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
