Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Maxwell et al v. Mehrotra et al
as 1:2025cv00092
Plaintiff:
Ellen Maxwell
Defendant:
Sanjay Mehrotra, Mark Murphy, Richard M Beyer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Murphy v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Kevin R. Mandia, Enrique Salem and others
Foote v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al

as 1:2021cv00169
Nominal Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven J. Gomo, Sanjay Mehrotra, Lawrence N. Mondry and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Foote
John Golub, et al v. Gigamon Inc., et al

as 19-16975
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL A. HOOPER, ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P., PAUL E. MILBURY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. GOLUB, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CARPENTER
Kaneko v. Mehrotra et al
as 1:2019cv01742
Nominal Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Ernest E. Maddock, Sanjay Mehrotra, Laurence N. Mondry and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Kaneko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sbriglio v. Mehrotra et al
as 1:2019cv00331
Defendant:
Mark Durcan, Micron Technology, Inc., Ernest E. Maddock and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Sbriglio
Gonzalez v. Mehrotra et al
as 1:2019cv00446
Nominal Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Ernest E. Maddock, Sanjay Mehrotra, Laurence N. Mondry and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie Gonzalez
Tonfack v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06845
Plaintiff:
Fulgence Tonfack
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Paul A. Hooper, Arthur W. Coviello, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushansky v. Gigamon Inc. et al

as 5:2017cv06842
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stouffer v. Gigamon Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv06789
Plaintiff:
Spencer Stouffer
Defendant:
Gigamon Inc., Corey M. Mulloy, Paul A. Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.