Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Addison v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2025cv00845
Plaintiff:
Shawn Addison
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Robert S. Dean, Jr., Chris Asangong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Addison v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2025cv00846
Plaintiff:
Shawn Addison
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Robert S. Dean, Jr., Kenneth Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Addison v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2025cv00841
Plaintiff:
Shawn Addison
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Robert S. Dean, Jr., Kenneth Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0596 Independent Counsel - Removal
Jose Tapia v. Robert Dean, Jr.
as 25-6054
Petitioner:
JOSE TAPIA
Respondent:
ROBERT S. DEAN, JR. and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenstry v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv01760
Defendant:
Antonio Cabezas, Robin Woolford, Gena Addison and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar McKenstry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stedman v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv01779
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Jr., Michelle A Taylor and Gregory A Werner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenstry v. Gamble et al
as 1:2024cv01636
Defendant:
Robert S. Dean, Jr., Melvin Norman, Raphael Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar T. McKenstry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Dean Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Jose Tapia
Respondent:
Robert S. Dean Jr. and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
