Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. Jager, et al
as 18-16351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAGER, Officer, D. RUSK, HOFFMAN and others
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. James Tilton, et al

as 14-16823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, Secretary of CDCR, ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, M.D. YOX, Associate Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison and others
Schrubb v. Jager et al

as 3:2013cv04163
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant:
Jager, D. Rusk, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schrubb v. Jager et al

as 2:2013cv01769
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant:
Jager, D. Rusk, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gore v. Napa State Hospital et al

as 2:2012cv01411
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Gore
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Robert A. Horel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gore v. Napa State Hospital et al

as 4:2012cv02196
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Gore
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Robert A. Horel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Andrews v. J. Evert, et al
as 11-17520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. EVERT, Library Technical Asst., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RAMONA REICH, Correction Officer and others
Mario Estrada v. Robert Horel, et al

as 11-15892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO H. ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, Warden, J. R. MCBRIDE, IGI, Correctional Officer, D. HIGGERSON, IGI, Sergeant and others
James Godoy, et al v. Robert Horel, et al
as 10-15801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES GODOY, RICK CRUZ, MIGUEL MARQUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, N. GRANNIS and others
Edward Mullins v. R. Wenciker, et al
as 10-15477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD J. MULLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WENCIKER, D. CHAPMAN, M. CARRASCO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.