Cases 1 - 10 of 55
JONES v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv10132
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JONES
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CADMUS v. THE BROWN FIRM, PLLC et al
as 2:2018cv04775
Defendant:
THE BROWN FIRM, PLLC, BRUCE A. JONES, CONSUMER LAW, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD R. CADMUS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv13637
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. JONES and ROBIN G. JONES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. JONES
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07685
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Muccino et al
as 3:2014cv01477
Plaintiff:
Robert X Jones
Defendant:
Muccino, John Tustin, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savage v. Jones et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Theodore Savage
Defendant:
Robert G Jones and Donald Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit, Director, Office Science & Technology Policy, Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
In re: Robert Jones, Jr.
as 13-3599
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT C. JONES, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
