Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dykes et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00783
Plaintiff:
Donna Dykes and Robert Dykes
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Dykes v. Fuller et al
as 4:2018cv11528
Plaintiff:
Robert Dykes
Defendant:
Fuller, Arbogast and Searfoss
DYKES JR. v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03191
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DYKES JR.
949) 737-1504 (fax:
Matthew R. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis et al v. County of Suffolket al
as 2:2017cv04582
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, County of Suffolk Department of Consumer Affairs, Leslie Dykes and others
Plaintiff:
R & V Home Remodeling of Long Island Corp. and Vernon T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Dykes v. Obell Winn, et al
as 15-1392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DYKES
Defendant - Appellee:
OBELL WINN, LLOYD RAPELJE, PRICE, Sgt. and others
Dykes v. Winn et al
as 2:2013cv13813
Plaintiff:
Robert Dykes
Defendant:
O T Winn, Lloyd W Rapelje, Price and others
Dykes v. Roberts, et al
as 5:2013cv13812
Plaintiff:
Robert Dykes
Defendant:
McRoberts, Smith, Osborn and others
Zoumboulaskis v. McGinn et al
as 5:2013cv02379
Plaintiff:
Sofia Zoumboulaskis
Defendant:
Richard A. McGinn, Robert W. Alspaugh, Leslie G. Denend and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bland v. VeriFone Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01853
Plaintiff:
Brian Bland
Defendant:
VeriFone Systems, Inc., Douglas G. Bergeron, Robert Dykes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Laborers Local 235 Benefit Funds v. VeriFone Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01676
Plaintiff:
Laborers Local 235 Benefit Funds
Defendant:
VeriFone Systems, Inc., Douglas G. Bergeron, Robert Dykes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
