Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Darrell Parks v. Wren, et al
as 13-55905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
WREN, Mailroom Supervisor, TOM BRODY, RENE GALAZ and others
Darrell Parks v. L. Ferguson, et al
as 13-55758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FERGUSON, Correctional Counselor, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, TIMOTHY BAKER, Case Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity, MARK TIPTON, Unit Manager, sued in Individual/Personal Capacity and others
Lebaron L Harris et al v. J Jackson et al
as 5:2013cv00649
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, B A Bledsoe and others
Plaintiff:
Lebaron L Harris
Darrell Parks v. L Ferguson et al
as 5:2013cv00470
Defendant:
Randall Bacon, Krista Bahre, Timothy Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Alberto Del Muro v. Fernando Arriola, et al
as 13-55134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO JOSE DEL MURO
Defendant - Appellee:
FERNANDO ARRIOLA, Warden, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator National and others
Benjamin Schwarz et al v. Erwin Meinberg et al
as 2:2013cv00356
Defendant:
Brenda Burch, Juan D Castillo, William F Dalius, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin R Schwarz and Stephen Yagman
Holmes v. McFadden et al
as 1:2012cv01769
Plaintiff:
Keenan T. Holmes
Defendant:
Robert E. McFadden, Paul Coppenhaver, D. Lorance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhodes v. Chavez et al
as 2:2012cv01971
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Rhodes
Defendant:
Ricardo E Chavez, J Hoffman, Robert E McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Darrell Parks v. Wren et al
as 5:2012cv01353
Defendant:
All Mailroom Staffs, Tom Brody, Stephen Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Parks
Lee v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Atwater, J. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
