Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Tardif v. Geico Indemnity Company
as 1:2011cv20546
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Tardif, Jr. , Rachel Bozella and Simon Turner
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tardif v. Geico Indemnity Company
as 2:2010cv00761
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Tardif, Jr. and Rachel Bozella
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00585
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00238
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Tardif v. The Law Offices of Robert J. Norton, P.A. et al
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Tardif, Jr. and Robert E. Tardif, Jr.
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Robert J. Norton, P.A. and Robert J. Norton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00034
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00033
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00759
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00478
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
