Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al

as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Nedra Hastings
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, et al

as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
Rhakim Martin
Defendant:
City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, Mary Thomas, Amy Weirich
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 2:2016cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Simpson v. Bredsen et al

as 2:2010cv02950
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
Phil Bredsen, William Oldham, Robert Moore
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigrett et al v. Cooper et al

as 2:2010cv02724
Plaintiff:
Harrison Kerr Tigrett , Regina Sugarmon , Russell Sugarmon
and others
Defendant:
Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Tre Hargett, Tennessee Department of State: Division of Elections
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Metcalf v. Harris et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Riley G Metcalf, Jr
Defendant:
Kent Harris, Bill Hensley, Robert Metcalf
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02691
Plaintiff:
Stanley Batts, Courtney J. Cain, Joanne Clinton
and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Batts et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01243
Plaintiff:
Stanley Batts, Courtney J. Cain, Joanne Clinton
and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
E.R. v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02378
Plaintiff:
E.R.
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Shelby County, Shelby County Sheriff's Department
and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.