Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Mark Gullet v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 21-3745
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Gullet
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
Charlene Deeken
Emily Davis v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Emily Davis
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities and Charlene Deeken
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Dillan Newbold v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dillan Newbold
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Terrence Ruffin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual an official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, T., in his individual and official capacities and others
Carter v. Shivers et al
as 4:2007cv01258
Plaintiff:
Danny E Carter and Danny E Carter
Defendant:
Earnest Shivers, II, Robert Lammert, Board of Police Commissioners St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
